Safety Issues Summary

Important safety information for anyone within 50 miles of the San Onofre Nuclear Plant

At the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, U.S. officials recommended Americans in Japan evacuate 50 miles. If you live or work in one of these five counties, you may be within the San Onofre 50 mile zone:

Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside,
San Bernardino, San Diego
 

There is no safe emergency plan. Over 8.7 million people living in a 50 mile radius need to evacuate if there is an emergency at San Onofre. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) does not require a current safe emergency plan for San Onofre (NRC Reg. 50.47).

Radiation from San Onofre will blow inland due to prevailing on-shore wind, so the safest evacuation location is upwind in the Pacific Ocean.

The NRC is under investigation for reducing safety standards in order to keep older nuclear plants running. The NRC has stricter rules for new plants than it does for existing nuclear plants.

San Onofre is not required to add safety systems that the NRC deems too expensive for the value of the lives they could save. The NRC value of a human life is roughly 1/3 to 1/2 the value used by other federal agencies ($3 million vs. $5-9 million).

San Onofre was redesigned for a 7.0 earthquake, but sits next to a fault capable of an 8.0 earthquake — 10 times more powerful and long overdue.

San Onofre unsafely stores tons of toxic radioactive waste and continues to produce over 600 pounds every day. The waste remains radioactive and dangerous to human health for thousands of years.

San Onofre’s “30 foot tsunami wall” is only 14 feet above high tide.

The NRC does not require seismic or tsunami studies for license renewal.  San Onofre was originally licensed to shut down in 2013, but was extended to 2022. Next year they plan to ask for an extension to 2042. The plant was designed in 1973 for a 40-year lifespan.

San Onofre has 10 times more safety violations than the industry average making it the most dangerous nuclear plant of all 64 plants (and 104 reactors) in the nation.

The NRC says San Onofre continues to have serious safety culture problems, including poor decision making and employees reluctant to report safety problems for fear of retaliation from their management.

Human error contributed to all major nuclear disasters in the world.  One human error contributed to Southern California’s 9/8/2011 massive power blackout. It can happen at San Onofre.

In the event of a severe accident at San Onofre, radiation leaks could create a permanent “dead zone” beyond Los Angeles, San Diego, Catalina, and Riverside.

Children and pregnant women are most vulnerable to radiation. Cancer and genetic damage go undetected for years.

Your home and property cannot be insured against a nuclear disaster and reactor owners have limited liability.

San Onofre kills millions of fish and other marine life every year, due to it’s once-through cooling system.

Sources

Print or download Safety Facts Summary Sheet

4 Responses to Safety Issues Summary

  1. Sarah says:

    What would it take to close this plant?

    • Donna Gilmore says:

      We need to get the California Nuclear Initiative on the ballot. In order to do that we volunteers and volunteer coordinators to circulate and gather signatures for the petition. We need people to spread the word, so people download the petition and sign it. We need for this to go viral on the internet and social media sites.
      http://californianuclearinitiative.com/cni-petition/

  2. Thank you for this excellent compilation of facts and references; which I will be sharing with a San Diego environmental coalition.

  3. shakey says:

    One point on the Richter scale represents 32 times the energy. So, a 8.0 quake is 32 times as powerful as a 7.0 quake.

    Of course the energy can be greater or less in some spots due to

    1. oscillatory nodes (reflection off of rocks could produce a standing wave, and that could create spots with little energy and spots with greatly intensified energy)
    2. focused by geological features (for example, the bulk of the energy might travel “somewhat” between layers of rock, which carries more energy because the energy is dispersed two dimensionally rather than three dimensionally).

    Sources:

    http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/intensity.html
    http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/awareness/nmsz.html
    http://faculty.coastalbend.edu/acdem/science/geol1305/logpage.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s