-
-
News
- Letter from wife of San Onofre Nuclear Operator to Governor Brown
- Public Comments due 5/16/2013: Stop NRC from lowering San Onofre safety standards
- 04/23/2013 Los Angeles City Council to decide on San Onofre
- 04/17/2013 WRCB meeting: Once-through cooling nuclear reactors
- 04/03/2013 MD NRC meeting: Edison request to lower San Onofre safety standards
- Chernobyl Health Effects
- Dan Hirsch: Why San Onofre is not safe to restart
- 02/21/2013 Costa Mesa CPUC meeting on San Onofre
- 02-12-2013 Capistrano Beach NRC meeting on San Onofre restart plan
- What Part of Fukushima Do You NOT understand?
-
Topics
- 10/25/2012 Media Kit – CPUC Public Meeting – San Onofre
- About
- Arnie Gundersen: Worst Steam Generators in Nation
- Berkeley
- BG NFC Presentation
- Blog
- CA Energy Commission
- Calendar
- California Nuclear Initiative
- California Nuclear Initiative
- City Council Handouts
- Contact Us
- Cost of Nuclear Power
- Del Mar
- Earthquake Risk
- Emergency Plan
- Encinitas
- Energy Options
- Fukushima
- GAO Audits
- Handouts
- Health Risks
- Home
- How to Help
- Independent Experts Speak
- Irvine
- Laguna Beach
- Los Angeles
- Media Handouts
- Members Only
- Mission Viejo
- NRC Problems
- Once-Through Cooling
- Orange County Cities
- Radiation Monitoring
- Radiation Waste – Into Eternity
- Safety Allegations
- Safety Issues Summary
- San Clemente
- San Clemente City Council
- San Diego School District
- Santa Monica
- School Handouts
- Solana Beach
- Three Mile Island
- Tsunami Risk
- U.S. Senate NRC Oversight
- Vista
Categories
Archives
Meta
Nightmare of Nuclear Waste
This entry was posted in Marine Life, Nuclear Waste, Radiation Monitoring, Video and tagged climate, climate change, Education, educational video, environment, health risks, nuclear power, nuclear waste, radiation health risks, radiation monitoring, science, video. Bookmark the permalink.
Donna Gilmore
I was hoping that you could contact a lab who is willing to take soil samples in the San Clemente area at various distances from the San Onofre plutonium generator plant stacks. It is very likely that thus far significant contamination has accumulated near the plant that diminishes with distance from it. We sorely need this quantitative information.
Dr. Richard Sauerheber
Dear Dr Sauerheber – each nuclear plant is required to maintain an environmental monitoring program and report the results. San Onofre’s annual report for 2011 was submitted in May 2012. Soil sample results on p. 61 of the pdf. Local crop sample results (lettuce, sorrel, strawberries, tomatos) on the pages before that. Many other surveys and samples are also reported. Your conclusion about what’s very likely is not at all backed up by existing data.
Report is available at http://adf.ly/HTHhB
Thank you for all you do.
We humbly offer this as another attempt at outreach and letting folks know the real score.
San Onofre – America’s Fukushima?
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum1/index.php?topic=2245.0
Do Citizens of Earth Have the Right to a Radiation-free Environment?
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum1/index.php?topic=1177.0#top
And my special project:
Earth Aid
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum1/index.php?topic=1405.0
With greatest respect,
your friend,
thorfourwinds
Pingback: Radiation Bulletin: Fuel Cycle/DOE: Jan. 14th – 20th 2013 | The Energy Net
Pingback: Radiation Bulletin: Nuclear News: Jan. 14th – 20th 2013 | The Energy Net
Pingback: Radiation Bulletin: Nuclear News: Jan. 14th – 20th 2013 » NFC