San Clemente

San Clemente City Council 2013

From left: Jim Evert, Mayor Pro Tem Chris Hamm, Bob Baker, Lori Donchak, Mayor Tim Brown

San Clemente City Council says there are serious safety issues at San Onofre. City Council voted 5-0 to support needed critical safety improvements at San Onofre.

City Hall
100 Avenida Presidio
San Clemente, CA 92672  
949-361-8200
Contact City Council members
Contact other city staff

San Clemente General Plan – Nuclear Section

City Council Meetings

12/17/2013 Meeting

San Clemente City Council unanimously passes Resolution 13-53 regarding the urgency of removing the dangerous nuclear waste from San Onofre, based on geographic conditions and dense population. The resolution was submitted as a comment to the NRC Waste Confidence Generic Environment Impact Statement (GEIS). The NRC GEIS concludes it is safe to store the tons of nuclear waste at all nuclear plants indefinitely.

The city also sent a letter to the NRC requesting an extension of the deadline for GEIS comments to February 28, 2014 and sent letters to cities within 20 miles, asking them to support the same action.  More…

07/18/2012 Meeting

City Council votes to send the following letters regarding San Onofre safety, cost and reliability concerns.

20011  Meetings – Lessons Learned from Fukushima

The San Clemente City Council sponsored several meetings and presentations regarding the implications of Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster for the San Onofre Nuclear Generation Station. This resulted in their conclusion that there are serious safety issues at the San Onofre nuclear plant.  Here are some key documents and presentations from those city council meetings.

10/18/2011 Meeting

ACTIONS TAKEN BY CITY COUNCIL

Following discussion, MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM EVERT, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, CARRIED 5-0, to:

1. Direct formal communication, on behalf of the citizens of San Clemente, to the NRC with copies to appropriate elected and appointed officials (including Orange County municipalities and the County of Orange Board of Supervisors with a summary of the action plan, encouraging them to follow San Clemente’s lead and to support the removal of spent nuclear fuel):

a. Support Senator Boxer’s and Feinstein’s efforts to advocate that the NRC modify its relicensing policies in order to assure a full reexamination of design basis elements, including seismic and tsunami hazards, operational issues, plant security, emergency preparedness, and spent nuclear storage options.

b. Insist that the NRC require that utilities move spent fuel rods to dry cask storage as soon as individual rods can safely be moved.

c. Support Senators Boxer’s and Feinstein’s call for the NRC to implement the short-term recommendations in the NRC 90 Day Task-Force Report as soon as possible and that it develop a feasible plan for implementing longer term recommendations.

2. Direct formal communication, on behalf of the citizens of San Clemente, to Senators Feinstein and Boxer and Congressmen Calvert and Issa:

a. Ask our Federal Elected Officials to demand the establishment of a permanent, safe, disposal site for spent nuclear fuel and the establishment of temporary sites, if necessary, to move spent fuel away from our community.

b. Ask our Federal Elected Officials to insist that a permanent off-site storage solution for spent fuel be identified before relicensing is granted to SONGS.

c. Ask our Federal Elected Officials to review the risk/benefit analysis that NRC uses to ensure that it adequately assesses public risk levels.

d. Support our Senators’ efforts to ensure the NRC implements the short-term recommendations in the NRC 90 Day Task-Force Report as soon as possible and that it develop a feasible plan for implementing longer term recommendations.

3. Request that the California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission support the proposed Southern California Edison enhanced seismic study of the region so that it begins as quickly as possible.

4. Pursue additional funding for the extension of La Pata as an additional evacuation route from San Clemente.

10/11/2011 Meeting

09/27/2011  Meeting

2 Responses to San Clemente

  1. Mel Kernahan says:

    This is invaluable, Bert. Thank you.

  2. Lupita Jimenez says:

    It’s going to take an “Occupy” type of action before these requests to take action will move forward.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s