Category Archives: California ISO

04/03/2013 MD NRC meeting: Edison request to lower San Onofre safety standards

Posted on April 1, 2013 by

UPDATE: The NRC announced plans to approve Edison’s request to lower San Onofre’s safety standards and may do so in less than the normal 30 day comment period –removing obstacles to a restart of the seriously defective San Onofre Unit … Continue reading →

Posted in Action Alert, California ISO, Events, NRC, Southern California Edison, Steam Generator, Video | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

11/14/2012 Santa Monica – California Coastal Commission meeting on whale killing seismic surveys

Posted on November 9, 2012 by

UPDATE: The Coastal Commission rejected PG&E’s proposal and said they didn’t need to come back to try again.   Coastal Commissioner Dayna Bochco said PG&E explained what the soundwaves would do. “They did convince me that there is a target … Continue reading →

Posted in Action Alert, California Coastal Commission, California ISO, Earthquake, Energy Options, Events, How to Help, Marine Life, nuclear power, Once-Through Cooling (OTC), PG&E, SDG&E, Senator Barbara Boxer, Southern California Edison, USGS | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

California plans for 7.8 earthquake but ignores San Onofre nuclear plant 7.0 design limit

Posted on October 18, 2012 by

California seismic planners want us to “drop, cover and hold on” as part of their Great ShakeOut earthquake drill for the expected and overdue 7.8 magnitude earthquake, yet they ignore the fact Southern California’s San Onofre nuclear power plant is … Continue reading →

Posted in Action Alert, California ISO, City Council, Earthquake, Emergency Planning, Energy Options, Fukushima, How to Help, NRC, SDG&E, Southern California Edison, Steam Generator | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Press release and handouts 10/9/2012 NRC San Onofre public meeting

Posted on October 9, 2012 by

2012-10-09 Press Release – No risky restart says public at NRC meeting in Dana Point No risky restart says public at today’s NRC meeting on San Onofre.  NRC License amendment process and adjudicatory evidentiary hearing demanded to ensure safety. Edison’s plan … Continue reading →

Posted in California ISO, CPUC, Friends of the Earth, How to Help, NRC, nuclear power, Press Release, Safety Allegations, San Clemente Green, SDG&E, Southern California Edison, Steam Generator | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Edison’s safety plan to restart San Onofre is to watch for radiation leaks

Posted on October 4, 2012 by

Southern California Edison’s safety plan to restart San Onofre nuclear reactor Unit 2 is to watch for radiation leaks.  They don’t know how to fix the reactor, so they’re just going to slow it down and see what happens.  Don’t allow … Continue reading →

Posted in Action Alert, California ISO, How to Help, NRC, Press Release, Radiation Monitoring, SDG&E, Southern California Edison, Steam Generator | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Cascading major design changes caused San Onofre nuclear reactor steam generator failures and radiation leak

Posted on April 12, 2012 by

Major steam generator design changes by Southern California Edison (SCE) are the likely cause of radiation leaks and unusual accelerated tube wear in the San Onofre nuclear power plant’s four steam generators, states a new study by nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen. San … Continue reading →

Posted in California ISO, Energy Options, Friends of the Earth, NRC, nuclear power, Radiation Monitoring, SDG&E, Southern California Edison, Steam Generator | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

No blackouts with San Onofre shut down

Posted on March 24, 2012 by

There will be no rolling blackouts this summer with San Onofre shut down. California’s electric grid operator has many options to prevent this.  The California Independent System Operator (ISO) on 3/22/2012 presented this list of various actions that would mitigate … Continue reading →

Posted in California ISO, Energy Options, SDG&E | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments